You know, sometimes life as a lady who loves ladies isn’t cake and sometimes I need a break. That rhymed motherfucker, is my life a lie now? Does my desire for fluff that centers my experience as a queer person negate my interest in totes serious media? Is this an asinine question that was asked and answered back in the fucking Cretaceous? I get to have both and happily Autostraddle provides both. This is why we’re BFF.
When linguistic specificity is so essential to normalizing and dignifying those identities that Autostraddle claims to include (by giving transpeople, queens, and butches the same voice and respect as, say, straight women), its casual treatment of language undermines its own important work.
Okay first of all, you don’t get to criticize Autostraddle’s “casual treatment of language’ while subjecting our identities to your casual ignorance. You need to put a space between ‘trans’ and ‘people’ because being trans is an aspect of a person’s humanity not the sum total of it. Queen is a term most commonly found in boy on boy culture, not girl on girl culture. This shit is basic, and the only undermining being done here is of your own argument. If you cannot be arsed enough to acquaint yourself with the goddamn minimum maybe you shouldn’t be throwing stones at this house you don’t own and didn’t build.
Oh, and this ‘linguistic vapidity’ business? How the fuck else does anyone normalize ‘nontraditional’ gender identities without incorporating them into their everyday speech? If I am seeking to legitimize and demystify an aspect of my identity I’m not going to approach it as something super fucking formal. My life is not a black tie event. I grant myself legitimacy when I share how my identity functions with the rest of the world clearly and in my own words. Autostraddle does the hard work of normalizing the specificities of queer life by presenting them along side NORMAL THINGS.
For the record, it isn’t Autostraddle’s job to normalize shit. Autostraddle’s job is to speak to the queer lady community in all it’s glorious complexity with honesty and sensitivity. It’s not always successful because no one ever is, but what the site does consistently succeed at is learning from its mistakes.
That doesn’t seem to be enough to elevate their content to ‘super academic legitimate hamburger’ status tho. What Autostraddle is failing to do is provide ‘edgy’ queer outreach to a whatever-wave straight feminist with a boner for academic condescension and an ax to grind about bourgie accessibility. Diane Clarke’s main objection seems to be that Autostraddle looks so *gasp* normal!
I do not know how to accept my values reflected in a voice I do not recognize as my own. I don’t expect the voice of the subaltern to sound like a cheerleader.
Diana Clark doesn’t get to tell me that I’m just so over right now because I belong to a club she presumes would have her. Sorry, but you can’t sit with us. Do we get our authenticity back now? I don’t know if you know Diana, but it’s not every day that my identity is celebrated. If Autostraddle’s upbeat attitude is cheering anyone on it’s me and thank god because I need it. It is made painfully clear to me everyday how much of a freak straight culture considers me to be.
I am a masc-of-center person assigned female at birth who frequently falls in love with people who identify as ladies. If that description sounded tortured that’s because it is. Lots of us are still hashing this shit out for ourselves and sites like Autostraddle help with the heavy lifting by giving us a space to do so without sacrificing our right to levity and cheer.
I used to frequent super heavy places like feministe. I respect their site and what they do, but their content is simply too unrelenting for me to keep up with while maintaining my mental health. I need the niceness, the cheeriness and the light touch Autostraddle so frequently employs because my life is already super dark. Needing these things doesn’t make me a bad queer or a bad feminist.
A website that makes money off of silly stuff isn’t news. A straight writer who attacks one of the few independent media outlets run by and for queer women in an effort to grapple with her own internalized misogyny is the real story.
There’s something troubling in consumer advocacy, beyond turning struggles into fashion statements. At some level, the commodification of activism on Autostraddle is a way to transmute difficult truths into digestible, feminized products—as containable and limited as Cosmopolitan’s ideal woman.
Newsflash queers, in order for our media to be truly legit we need to defeat capitalism first. Lesbian separatism is the new Pilates! No wait, I mean down with Pilates because it’s part of racist capitalist patriarchy! I mean kyriarchy. I mean fuck Autostraddle for trying to live in a world where capitalism exists without carting themselves off to the new Trans and Bi inclusive Lesbian compound where barefooted dykes spin their own yarn and manufacture artisan Q-tips.
Does Autostraddle routinely publish articles written in the *ahem* millennial vernacular? Fucking duh. Does modulating one’s tone in order to make difficult and weighty topics accessible inherently inauthentic and or trivializing? Fucking no. Did Diana Clarke dedicate her debut article on The Baffler to tone policing? Fucking yes. By publishing this article, did The Baffler engage in the same lucrative clickbait tactics that this article accuses Autostraddle of doing? Who’s to say? Lol, j/k. Yes, obvs yes.
tl;dr Autostraddle is not a perfect media outlet. It has fucked up and fucked up royally in the past. While it has made marked progress incorporating a larger variety of voices in the articles it features, Autostraddle’s core editorial staff is still predominantly white and cis. There are a lot of real reasons to criticize Autostraddle, Diana Clarke chose to ignore all of them and engage in dumb as fuck tone policing, instead.
Physician, decolonize thyself.