ohhowgooditwas
:
yes yes yes yes to all of this. (and thanks!)
i think we could commit to that but i wonder if it might also work just to devote a theme month like “your fave is TOTALLY NOT problematic” you know what i mean?
what’s funny is that y’all don’t even see all the stories we filter out or pitches we reject because we think they’re trying too hard to be critical for criticism’s sake. and the first week of training with the potential new CEs was a lot of us saying over and over again, ‘i think that’s a bit of a reach’ or ‘i don’t think [x] is really worth our energy’ — and i’m not criticizing them for this, you know, i think somehow this is what people think sites like ours WANT to publish and it truly isn’t. because that’s usually the stuff people remember about your site, those takedowns, ‘cause that’s what gets shared on facebook the most. people still remember me for that taylor swift thing, you know? sure, it definitely happens we’ll put something up and then think afterwards, ‘okay maybe that was too much’. i just feel like if we keep crying wolf nobody is going to notice the WOLFPACK.
but personally i think my exhaustion with that whole racket is that i’ve been doing pop culture criticism for so long that i’m not as challenged by it as i used to be. i really prefer and feel more excited about and interested in writing about why a thing is awesome or deserves redemption than why it is terrible. and i didn’t do this kind of work in school, but i’ve been reading bitch magazine pretty much since it came out, so i think that’s where i learned how to do this.
also so much of this criticism (and the really obsessive monitoring of who said or was somehow involved in something that was in the same realm as something problematic) is really ahistorical too. but i could talk about the Ahistorical Approach Epidemic for like another 10,000 words so i’ll stop